Agenda Item: | 2. | Agenda Title: | Discussion and update regarding current and future City projects and priorities for strategic planning purposes including, short and long-term budgets for all operational needs and capital improvement projects | Council Action:
| Discussion | Department: | Assistant City Manager | Staff Contact: | Lindsey Oskoui |
1. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE
Continued discussion of draft Capital Improvements Plan.
2. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
a) Background
At their July 16, 2021 workshop, Council had initial discussion about potential funding mechanisms and projects for the City’s first Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). For a recap of what was discussed see the transmittal letter and the attached powerpoint that was used as a guide during the discussion.
b) Issues and Analysis
Based on the feedback received, staff has put together a draft CIP “strategy” that encompasses; see attached graphic showing how the information for each project is arranged:
- A comprehensive list of road; pedestrian; and buildings and facilities capital projects for the next five to ten years. (See attached compendium of individual project sheets for more information.)
- By project,
- approximate timing of major project milestones (e.g. planning/design; land acquisition; construction commencement);
- approximate project costs, including 1) total cost* 2) per fiscal year and 3) total costs over the next five fiscal years (the primary timeframe of the CIP); andfunding source(s).
*In cases where issuance of debt is a/the proposed funding source, interest has also been estimated based the parameters discussed at the prior workshop – 2% over a 16 year payment schedule.
Preparation of the strategy incorporated the following:
- Council feedback on priority projects and fiscal policies
- Economic Development Board feedback on priority projects and fiscal policies
- An internal staff assessment of each project that factored in:
- Up front capital costs;
- Annual operating costs;
- Effects on health and safety;
- Environmental, aesthetic, and social effects;
- Feasibility of implementation;
- Implication of deferment;
- Interjurisdictional commitments;
- Fulfillment of city goals and policies; and
- Prior City investment on a related project
- Existing and projected revenue
- Existing and future debt service obligations
- Interrelated effects of projects on one another and on projects outside the scope of the CIP—and vice versa.
Though the attached strategy focuses on next five fiscal years, FY 21/22 through 25/26, the underlying analysis included debt service projections through the life of bonds.
3. FINANCIAL/BUDGET
Amount Requested | | | Fund/Account No. | | Cert. Obligation | | | GO Funds | | Other source | | | Grant title
| | Addtl tracking info | |
4. TIMELINE CONSIDERATIONS
5. RECOMMENDATION
|